In silico evaluation of plant-derived bioactive compounds targeting the mtor pathway in breast cancer: picroside ii as a promising natural inhibitor
Abstract
Breast cancer represents nearly 25% of all cancer diagnoses and is a complex condition comprising various subtypes that are classified based on the presence or absence of hormone receptors. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway plays a central role in breast cancer development, as it governs crucial cellular activities such as growth, proliferation, and survival. This pathway is frequently disrupted in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. Though mTOR inhibitors, such as rapamycin and its analog (rapalog), have shown promise in treatment, their clinical use is often hindered by undesirable side effects. Therefore, the development of novel inhibitors targeting the mTOR pathway is crucial. This study investigates the binding efficiency and molecular interactions of several anti-carcinogenic bioactive compounds namely Vindoline, Vincristine, Vinblastine, Picroside, And Cucurbitacin B against the mTOR complex using the Schrödinger Suite for molecular docking analysis. These compounds, derived from medicinal plants traditionally used in cancer therapies, including those in Siddha and other traditional medicine systems, have demonstrated therapeutic promise. Among the evaluated compounds, Picroside II, isolated from Picrorhiza kurroa, a medicinal herb extensively used in traditional Chinese medicine, showed the highest binding affinity (-12.134 kcal/mol) for mTOR, surpassing that of the reference inhibitor rapamycin. These results indicate that Picroside II could be a promising lead compound for further research in breast cancer therapy, with the potential to offer benefits over current mTOR inhibitors. These results indicate that Picroside II could be a promising lead compound for further research in the treatment of cancer, with the potential to provide improved efficacy compared to existing mTOR inhibitors.
Keywords:
mTOR Inhibition, Breast Cancer, Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds, Picroside II, Molecular Docking, Schrödinger SuiteDOI
https://doi.org/10.22376/References
1. Watkins EJ. Overview of breast cancer. Jaapa. 2019 Oct 1;32(10):13-7.
2. Baselga J. Targeting the phosphoinositide‐3 (PI3) kinase pathway in breast cancer. The oncologist. 2011 Jan 1;16(S1):12-9.
3. López-Miranda E, Tolosa-Ortega P, Perelló-Martorell MA, Sánchez-Lorenzo L, Hinojo-González C, Servitja S, Recalde-Penabad S, Olier-Gárate C, Guerrero JA, García-Vicente S, Mina L. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression dynamics between diagnosis and recurrence in patients with breast cancer using artificial intelligence and electronic health records: the RosHER study. ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology. 2025 Mar 1;7:100107.
4. Yersal O, Barutca S. Biological subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic implications. World journal of clinical oncology. 2014 Aug 10;5(3):412.
5. Orrantia-Borunda E, Anchondo-Nuñez P, Acuña-Aguilar LE, Gómez-Valles FO, Ramírez-Valdespino CA. Subtypes of breast cancer. Breast Cancer [Internet]. 2022 Aug 6.
6. Glaviano A, Foo AS, Lam HY, Yap KC, Jacot W, Jones RH, Eng H, Nair MG, Makvandi P, Geoerger B, Kulke MH. PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling transduction pathway and targeted therapies in cancer. Molecular cancer. 2023 Aug 18;22(1):138.
7. Hartkopf AD, Grischke EM, Brucker SY. Endocrine-resistant breast cancer: mechanisms and treatment. Breast care. 2020 Aug 21;15(4):347-54.
8. Campbell RA, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Patel NM, Constantinidou D, Ali S, Nakshatri H. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT-mediated activation of estrogen receptor α: a new model for anti-estrogen resistance. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001 Mar 30;276(13):9817-24.
9. Yardley DA. Combining mTOR inhibitors with chemotherapy and other targeted therapies in advanced breast cancer: rationale, clinical experience, and future directions. Breast cancer: basic and clinical research. 2013 Jan;7:BCBCR-S10071.
10. Mayer I. Role of mTOR inhibition in preventing resistance and restoring sensitivity to hormone-targeted and HER2-targeted therapies in breast cancer. Clinical advances in hematology & oncology: H&O. 2013 Apr;11(4):217.
11. Vézina C, Kudelski A, Sehgal SN. Rapamycin (AY-22, 989), a new antifungal antibiotic I. taxonomy of the producing streptomycete and isolation of the active principle. The Journal of antibiotics. 1975;28(10):721-6.
12. Kennedy BK, Lamming DW. The mechanistic target of rapamycin: the grand conducTOR of metabolism and aging. Cell metabolism. 2016 Jun 14;23(6):990-1003.
13. Loewith R, Jacinto E, Wullschleger S, Lorberg A, Crespo JL, Bonenfant D, Oppliger W, Jenoe P, Hall MN. Two TOR complexes, only one of which is rapamycin sensitive, have distinct roles in cell growth control. Molecular cell. 2002 Sep 1;10(3):457-68.
14. Saxton, R. A. & Sabatini, D. M. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell 168, 960–976 (2017).
15. Benjamin D, Colombi M, Moroni C, Hall MN. Rapamycin passes the torch: a new generation of mTOR inhibitors. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2011 Nov;10(11):868-80.
16. Hay N, Sonenberg N. Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes & development. 2004 Aug 15;18(16):1926-45.
17. Dowling RJ, Topisirovic I, Fonseca BD, Sonenberg N. Dissecting the role of mTOR: lessons from mTOR inhibitors. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Proteins and Proteomics. 2010 Mar 1;1804(3):433-9.
18. Ballou LM, Selinger ES, Choi JY, Drueckhammer DG, Lin RZ. Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling by 2-(morpholin-1-yl) pyrimido [2, 1-α] isoquinolin-4-one. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007 Aug 17;282(33):24463-70.
19. De Oliveira MA, e Martins FM, Wang Q, Sonis S, Demetri G, George S, Butrynski J, Treister NS. Clinical presentation and management of mTOR inhibitor-associated stomatitis. Oral oncology. 2011 Oct 1;47(10):998-1003.
20. Arriola Apelo SI, Lamming DW. Rapamycin: an InhibiTOR of aging emerges from the soil of Easter Island. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2016 Jul 1;71(7):841-9.
21. Li J, Kim SG, Blenis J. Rapamycin: one drug, many effects. Cell metabolism. 2014 Mar 4;19(3):373-9.
22. Peddi PF, Shatsky RA, Hurvitz SA. Noninfectious pneumonitis with the use of mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer. Cancer treatment reviews. 2014 Mar 1;40(2):320-6.
23. Rozengurt E, Soares HP, Sinnet-Smith J. Suppression of feedback loops mediated by PI3K/mTOR induces multiple overactivation of compensatory pathways: an unintended consequence leading to drug resistance. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2014 Nov 1;13(11):2477-88.
24. Chandra S, Gahlot M, Choudhary AN, Palai S, de Almeida RS, de Vasconcelos JE, dos Santos FA, de Farias PA, Coutinho HD. Scientific evidences of anticancer potential of medicinal plants. Food Chemistry Advances. 2023 Oct 1;2:100239.
25. Yadav N, Deshmukh R, Mazumder R. A comprehensive review on the use of traditional Chinese medicine for cancer treatment. Pharmacological Research-Modern Chinese Medicine. 2024 Jun 1;11:100423.
26. Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world. Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy. 2019 Apr 10:151-64.
27. Society AC. Cancer facts & figures 2017. J. Consum. Health Internet. 2012;16:366-7.
28. Colditz GA, Rosner B. Cumulative risk of breast cancer to age 70 years according to risk factor status: data from the Nurses' Health Study. American journal of epidemiology. 2000 Nov 15;152(10):950-64.
29. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, 2001. Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease. The Lancet, 358(9291), pp.1389-1399.
30. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Personal habits and indoor combustions. Volume 100 E. A review of human carcinogens. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. 2012;100(PT E):1.
31. Baer HJ, Tworoger SS, Hankinson SE, Willett WC. Body fatness at young ages and risk of breast cancer throughout life. American journal of epidemiology. 2010 Jun 1;171(11):1183-94.
32. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC handbooks of cancer prevention. The Agency; 2005.
33. Apostolou P, Fostira F. Hereditary breast cancer: the era of new susceptibility genes. BioMed research international. 2013;2013(1):747318.
34. Kenemans P, Verstraeten RA, Verheijen RH. Oncogenic pathways in hereditary and sporadic breast cancer. Maturitas. 2004 Sep 24;49(1):34-43.
35. Yersal O, Barutca S. Biological subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic implications. World journal of clinical oncology. 2014 Aug 10;5(3):412.
36. Nicolini A, Ferrari P, Duffy MJ. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer: Past, present and future. InSeminars in cancer biology 2018 Oct 1 (Vol. 52, pp. 56-73). Academic Press.
37. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, Van De Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10869-74.
38. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. 2012 Sep Nature 490: 61–70.
39. Zhang W, Haines BB, Efferson C, Zhu J, Ware C, Kunii K, Tammam J, Angagaw M, Hinton MC, Keilhack H, Paweletz CP. Evidence of mTOR activation by an AKT-independent mechanism provides support for the combined treatment of PTEN-deficient prostate tumors with mTOR and AKT inhibitors. Translational Oncology. 2012 Dec 1;5(6):422-9.
40. Bruhn MA, Pearson RB, Hannan RD, Sheppard KE. AKT-independent PI3-K signaling in cancer–emerging role for SGK3. Cancer management and research. 2013 Aug 26:281-92.
41. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74.
42. Lien EC, Dibble CC, Toker A. PI3K signaling in cancer: beyond AKT. Current opinion in cell biology. 2017 Apr 1;45:62-71.
43. Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007 Jun 29;129(7):1261-74.
44. Choi J, Chen J, Schreiber SL, Clardy J. Structure of the FKBP12-rapamycin complex interacting with binding domain of human FRAP. Science. 1996 Jul 12;273(5272):239-42.
45. Royce ME, Osman D. Everolimus in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Breast cancer: basic and clinical research. 2015 Jan;9:BCBCR-S29268.
46. Dar RA, Shahnawaz M, Qazi PH. General overview of medicinal plants: A review. The journal of phytopharmacology. 2017;6(6):349-51.
47. Hou YN, Deng G, Mao JJ. Practical application of “about herbs” website: herbs and dietary supplement use in oncology settings. The Cancer Journal. 2019 Sep 1;25(5):357-66.
48. Scott Luper ND. A review of plants used in the treatment of liver disease: part two. Alternative Medicine Review. 1999;4(3):178-89.
49. Dwivedi Y, Rastogi R, Garg NK, Dhawan BN. Picroliv and its components kutkoside and picroside I protect liver against galactosamine‐induced damage in rats. Pharmacology & toxicology. 1992 Nov;71(5):383-7.
50. Almeleebia TM, Alsayari A, Wahab S. Pharmacological and clinical efficacy of Picrorhiza kurroa and its secondary metabolites: A comprehensive review. Molecules. 2022 Nov 29;27(23):8316.
51. Gao H, ZHOU YW. Inhibitory effect of picroside II on hepatocyte apoptosis 1. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2005 Jun;26(6):729-36.
52. Huang Y, Zhou M, Li C, Chen Y, Fang W, Xu G, Shi X. Picroside II protects against sepsis via suppressing inflammation in mice. American journal of translational research. 2016 Dec 15;8(12):5519.
53. Wang Y, Chen R, Yang Z, Wen Q, Cao X, Zhao N, Yan J. Protective effects of polysaccharides in neurodegenerative diseases. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2022 Jul 4;14:917629.
54. Clericuzio M, Mella M, Vita-Finzi P, Zema M, Vidari G. Cucurbitane Triterpenoids from Leucopaxillus g entianeus. Journal of natural products. 2004 Nov 29;67(11):1823-8.
55. Lou C, Xu X, Chen Y, Zhao H. Alisol A suppresses proliferation, migration, and invasion in human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Molecules. 2019 Oct 10;24(20):3651.
56. Wang Y, Huang J, Ma Y, Tang G, Liu Y, Chen X, Zhang Z, Zeng L, Wang Y, Ouyang YB, Yang GY. MicroRNA-29b is a therapeutic target in cerebral ischemia associated with aquaporin 4. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2015 Dec;35(12):1977-84.
Published

How to Cite
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.