Genes, can it affect body response to medicines? An understanding of the concept of pharmacogenetics

Authors

  • Zainab .A .H Alebady Department ofpathological analysis, College of Science, University of AL-Qadisiyah, AL-Diwaniyah, Iraq
  • Ban Adnan Hatem Department of Chemistry, College of Science, University of AL-Qadisiyah, AL-Diwaniyah, Iraq
  • Jinan Abdul-Amir Sabeeh Al-Hussaini Department of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of AL-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Abstract

Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics are rapidly advancing disciplines that explore how genetic variations influence individual responses to medications. Differences in DNA sequences can alter drug metabolism, absorption, distribution, and excretion, resulting in variable therapeutic outcomes and adverse drug reactions. The identification of these genetic differences offers the potential for personalized or targeted medicine, enabling healthcare professionals to select optimal drug types and dosages for each patient. Genetic polymorphisms, particularly single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), are major determinants of interindividual variability in drug response. Understanding these variations can improve treatment efficacy and reduce toxicity, especially in drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, such as anticancer agents. Although the application of pharmacogenetic testing faces challenges including high cost, limited accessibility, and the need for global acceptance, its integration into medical practice represents a promising step toward individualized therapy. Advances in genomic sequencing and bioinformatics are expected to expand pharmacogenetic databases and strengthen clinical applications. Ultimately, the field aims to enhance patient safety, treatment outcomes, and quality of life through a deeper understanding of genetic diversity and its impact on pharmacological responses.

Keywords:

Pharmacogenetics, Pharmacogenomics, Personalized Medicine, Genomic Diagnostics, High-Throughput Screening, Genetic Variability

DOI

https://doi.org/10.70604/

References

1. Roses, A.D., 2004. Pharmacogenetics and drug development: the path to safer and more effective drugs. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(9), pp.645-656.

2. Marshall, A. and Hodgson, J., 1998. DNA chips: an array of possibilities. Nature biotechnology, 16(1), pp.27-31.

3. Mader, S. and Windelspecht, M., 2015. Human biology. McGraw-Hill Education.

4. Siechen, S. and Wilson, D.M., 2015. Biology 141 Principles of Biology I Spring 2015.

5. Pack, P.E., 2011. CliffsAP biology. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

6. Molnar, C. and Gair, J., 2015. Concepts of Biology: 1st Canadian Edition.

7. https://www.news-medical.net/life-sciences/DNA-Biological-Functions.aspx

8. Equity, T., 2014. College Biology Volume 3 of 3. Lulu. com.

9. ( https://www.britannica.com/science/human-genome)

10. Murray, R.K., Granner, D.K., Mayes, P.A. and Rodwell, V.W., 2014. Harper’s illustrated biochemistry. Mcgraw-hill.

11. Vasudevan, D.M., Sreekumari, S. and Vaidyanathan, K., 2013. Textbook of biochemistry for medical students. JP Medical Ltd.

12. https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/basics/gene

13. Wagner, A., 1998. The fate of duplicated genes: loss or new function?. BioEssays, 20(10), pp.785-788.

14. Wilchek, M. and Bayer, E.A., 1990. Methods in enzymology.

15. (https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/gene-expression-central-ogma/transcription-of-dna-into-rna/a/stages-of-transcription)

16. Wright, A.F., 2001. Genetic variation: polymorphisms and mutations. e LS.

17. https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-genetic-variation-sources-definition-types.html

18. Friedberg, E.C., 2003. DNA damage and repair. Nature, 421(6921), pp.436-440.

19. http://www2.csudh.edu/nsturm/CHEMXL153/DNAMutationRepair.htm

20. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/SearchResults?query=Overview+of+Response+to+Drugs

21. Ritter, J., Lewis, L., Mant, T. and Ferro, A., 2008. A textbook of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. CRC Press.

22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/pharmacogenetics

23. Syvänen, A.C., 2001. Accessing genetic variation: genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2(12), pp.930-942.

24. H Lee, N., 2010. Pharmacogenetics of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters: effects on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry (Formerly Current Medicinal Chemistry-Anti-Cancer Agents), 10(8), pp.583-592

25. Estlin, E.J., 2001. Continuing therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: clinical and cellular pharmacology of methotrexate, 6-mercaptopurine and 6-thioguanine. Cancer treatment reviews, 27(6), pp.351-363.

26. Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J. and Ward, E., 2010. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 60(5), pp.277-300.

27. Borst, P., Evers, R., Kool, M. and Wijnholds, J., 2000. A family of drug transporters: the multidrug resistance-associated proteins. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 92(16), pp.1295-1302.

28. International HapMap Consortium, 2003. The international HapMap project. Nature, 426(6968), p.789.

29. Thompson, I.M., Tangen, C.M., Tolcher, A., Crawford, E.D., Eisenberger, M. and Moinpour, C.M., 2001. Association of African-American ethnic background with survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 93(3), pp.219-225.

Published

2025-12-30
Statistics
Abstract Display: 56
PDF Downloads: 67

How to Cite

Alebady, Z., Adnan Hatem, B., & Abdul-Amir Sabeeh Al-Hussaini, jinan. (2025). Genes, can it affect body response to medicines? An understanding of the concept of pharmacogenetics. Journal of Modern Techniques in Biology and Allied Sciences, 2(4), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.70604/

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Alebady, Z., Adnan Hatem, B., & Abdul-Amir Sabeeh Al-Hussaini, jinan. (2025). Genes, can it affect body response to medicines? An understanding of the concept of pharmacogenetics. Journal of Modern Techniques in Biology and Allied Sciences, 2(4), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.70604/