The Role of Molecular Docking in Drug Discovery: Current Approaches and Innovations

Authors

  • Jilla Tharun Priyadharshini Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 5th Mile, Pulladigunta, Guntur- 522017, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

Molecular docking is a crucial computational technique used to predict the binding mode and affinity between ligands and target macromolecules, playing an integral role in drug discovery and development. This review delves into the methodologies, challenges, and advancements in molecular docking, emphasizing its application in virtual screening, drug repurposing, and lead optimization. The process of molecular docking relies on accurate pose and affinity predictions, which are influenced by the choice of docking program, test set diversity, and algorithmic approaches. Various docking software tools, each with their strengths and limitations, are compared to highlight their performance in different contexts. The review also explores recent trends in molecular docking, particularly its contribution to combating emerging diseases like COVID-19. Additionally, it addresses the integration of deep learning (DL) algorithms into docking experiments, enhancing pose selection and improving the accuracy of binding affinity predictions. Despite the progress, the identification of near-native binding poses remains a significant challenge, with current scoring functions often falling short in predicting the correct ligand conformation. As molecular docking methods evolve, the combination of computational techniques and DL-driven innovations holds great promise for more efficient and precise drug discovery. This review aims to provide valuable insights for researchers and clinicians in the bioinformatics and pharmaceutical industries, offering guidance on the use of docking techniques to design and optimize therapeutic agents for various diseases.

Keywords:

Mechanism of docking, CADD, drug discovery, computational methods, ligand, scoring function, algorithm, pose selection

DOI

https://doi.org/10.70604/ijzels.v2i2.55

References

1. Prakash K, Awen BZ, Rao CB, Kumari AS. Fabrication and in vitro evaluation of subgingival strips of calcium alginate for controlled delivery of ofloxacin and metronidazole.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096361

2. Satyaveni M, Sai Sowjanya M, Sreenivasulu K, Sreekanth N, Baburao C. Respirocytes: Mechanical artificial red blood cells. Int. J. Biol. Pharm. Res. 2013;4(4):297-301.

https://wjpr.net/public/index.php/abstract_file/8932

3. Katakam P, Padala NR, Chandu BR, Elfituri A, Adiki SK, Kommu R. Design of lamivudine XR matrix tablets: Influence of HPMC and PEO on in vitro drug release and bioavailability in rabbits. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2013 Aug 1;6(8):845-52.

https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200713384

4. Nama S, Baburao C. Enhancement of dissolution rate of cefixime trihydrate by using various solid dispersion techniques. Int J Pharm Ther. 2013;4(3):140-7.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S6-S3

5. Rani TT, Brahmaiah B, Revathi B, Nama S, Baburao C. TARGETING OF ANTI CANCER DRUGS THROUGH NANOPARTICLES [Internet]. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897

6. Abagyan R, Totrov M, Kuznetsov D. ICM—A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native

https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540150503

7. Burle, G. S., Kakullamarri, P. R., Kothamasu, S. B., Kallam, S. D. M., & Bodapati, A. (2024). Case Study on Regulatory Approaches for New Degradation Impurity Exceeding ICH Thresholds in Solubilized Ibuprofen Capsules During Stability Testing. Journal of International Research in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 19(3), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.56557/jirmeps/2024/v19i3893

8. López-Vallejo F, Caulfield T, Martínez-Mayorga K, A Giulianotti M, Nefzi A, A Houghten R, L Medina-Franco J. Integrating virtual screening and combinatorial chemistry for accelerated drug discovery. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening. 2011 Jul 1;14(6):475-87

https://doi.org/10.2174/138620711795767866

9. Shah M, Patel M, Shah M, Patel M, Prajapati M. Computational transformation in drug discovery: A comprehensive study on molecular docking and quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR). Intelligent Pharmacy. 2024 Mar 9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipha.2024.03.001

10. Torres PH, Sodero AC, Jofily P, Silva-Jr FP. Key topics in molecular docking for drug design. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019 Sep 15;20(18):4574.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184574

11. Ferreira LG, Dos Santos RN, Oliva G, Andricopulo AD. Molecular docking and structure- based drug design strategies. Molecules. 2015 Jul 22;20(7):13384-421. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200713384

12. Ferreira LG, Dos Santos RN, Oliva G, Andricopulo AD. Molecular docking and structure- based drug design strategies. Molecules. 2015 Jul 22;20(7):13384-421. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200713384

13. Pinzi L, Rastelli G. Molecular docking: shifting paradigms in drug discovery. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019 Sep 4;20(18):4331.

https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SC06946B

14. Li Y, Han L, Liu Z, Wang R. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results. Journal of chemical information and modeling. 2014 Jun 23;54(6):1717-36.

https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500081m

15. Batool M, Ahmad B, Choi S. A structure-based drug discovery paradigm. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019 Jun 6;20(11):2783.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20112783

16. 16. Schwede T, Diemand A, Guex N, Peitsch MC. Protein structure computing in the genomic era. Research in Microbiology. 2000 Mar 1;151(2):107-1

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-2508(00)00121-2

17. Abagyan R, Totrov M. High-throughput docking for lead generation. Current opinion in chemical biology. 2001 Aug 1;5(4):375-82.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00217-9

18. Branden CI, Tooze J. Introduction to protein structure. Garland Science; 2012 Mar 26. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781136969898

19. Yuriev E, Agostino M, Ramsland PA. Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review. Journal of Molecular Recognition. 2011 Mar;24(2):149-64

https://doi.org/10.1002/jmr.1077

20. 20. Huang SY, Zou X. Advances and challenges in protein-ligand docking. International journal of molecular sciences. 2010 Aug 18;11(8):3016-34.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11083016

21. Ferrara P, Gohlke H, Price DJ, Klebe G, Brooks CL. Assessing scoring functions for protein− ligand interactions. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2004 Jun 3;47(12):3032-47. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm030489h

Jilla Tharun

Published

2025-06-25
Statistics
Abstract Display: 153
PDF Downloads: 85

How to Cite

Jilla, T. (2025). The Role of Molecular Docking in Drug Discovery: Current Approaches and Innovations. International Journal of Zoology, Environment and Life Sciences , 2(2), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.70604/ijzels.v2i2.55

Issue

Section

Articles

Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/lapinjournals/domains/lapinjournals.com/public_html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.php on line 68

How to Cite

Jilla, T. (2025). The Role of Molecular Docking in Drug Discovery: Current Approaches and Innovations. International Journal of Zoology, Environment and Life Sciences , 2(2), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.70604/ijzels.v2i2.55